Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'block producers'.
Found 1 result
The current block producer situation of Enumivo is such that they have no accountability for their actions or their block producing node. The issue is something which has been brought up numerous times in the past but has not been solved. One of the sticking points to the situation is the topic of block producers being forced to reveal their identity in order to receive voting from the RoE fund. Some members believe they should not have to reveal their identity while others believe this poses a huge risk to the security of the chain. The current arguments AGAINST requiring identification are: It reveals the true identity of the person behind the BP] Bitcoin is anonymously operated The government will be able to see their name's with less effort The current arguments FOR requiring identification are: It makes the block producer accountable for their actions It ensures they are not running multiple BP nodes (increasing chance of an attack on the network Our network is not secure if we do not know who is being paid to secure it BPs are responsible for handling your money No one will take us seriously as a DPOS chain with anonymous block producers and developers. If you agree that block producers should reveal their identity in order to receive voting from the RoE then vote YES if you disagree vote NO. **For clarity, by reveal identity it is meant the block producers should reveal their true names and prove their identity - The method by which ID will be verified will be decided once we have decided this**