Jump to content
Enumivo Community

ansen

Members
  • Content count

    142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

ansen last won the day on January 13

ansen had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

98 Excellent

Crypto Addresses

  • Ethereum
    0x8587cff276960bcaffdcb67994ebac944e2cd152
  • Bitcoin
    1E8eoUDoXLNagHiL3NGaZimEqphCBgoiTB
  • LiteShares
    ansen9
  • Enumivo
    ansenironman

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I don't like this idea. The funds should be spent on more meaningful stuff. No.
  2. ansen

    Vote for active BPs!

    ansenironman support
  3. Now we have only the "Open motions" and "Close motions" topics. I propose we add a "Pending Motion" topic to make our discussion more efficient. What is a "pending motion" topic? All new motions first go to this pending motion topic. a motion is pending means it gains explicit approvals of less than 1/3 of the total number of RoE members. a RoE member can refuse to give approval/disapproval to a pending motion. once a pending motion collects equal or more than 1/3 of the total votes, it is moved to the open motion. Which means all RoE members MUST give votes within 7 days, which is second motion of this post .
  4. ansen

    Motion to secure the Block Producers

    I vote NO. Even though RoE has the right to properly use the 50M voting power, we have to take the responsibility to make good use of it. We need to tell the good BP's from the bad ones. But forcing the BP's to show their identity is neither reasonable nor practical. On one hand, We don't need to know Aiden's identity, but we all know he's a great man. Same for the good BP's, they just need to do good job and secure the blockchain, that's enough. On the other hand, a bad BP can easily fool this system just asking several friends' ID card. Introducing identity makes it too much complicated.
×